Yes i think that governmental promotion is great.I wonder why it hasn't happened here.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Jérôme Blanc <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jerome.blanc@ish-lyon.cnrs.fr">jerome.blanc@ish-lyon.cnrs.fr</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Dear all,<br>
<br>
As far as I have understood those moves, it seems that a series of south-american governments are promoting the development of CCS : Brazil, Uruguay, Venezuela.<br>
Do anyone know if there are other cases like that ? What is your opinion on this subject ?<br>
<br>
My question arises because it seemed clear to me that CCs were distant regarding governments (more central ones than local ones, of course). Especially, I use to qualify CCs as civil society-driven schemes, so that it is a bit contradictory to get society-driven schemes under government promotion. Of course, the contradiction depends on the way governments promote them...<br>
Do anyone have an opinion on that ? maybe information ?<br>
<br>
---<br>
Jérôme Blanc<br>
<br>
Maître de conférences / Associate professor<br>
Université Lumière Lyon 2<br>
France<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
cc_research mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cc_research@complementarycurrency.org" target="_blank">cc_research@complementarycurrency.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.complementarycurrency.org/mailman/listinfo/cc_research_complementarycurrency.org" target="_blank">http://mail.complementarycurrency.org/mailman/listinfo/cc_research_complementarycurrency.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>